By using even more POW? You're not talking any sense. Governance model was designed since the beginning. Takeovers are things that happen all the time in free markets.
ABC is not bitcoin. Stated by Aumary and Jihan several times. It's an centralized dev circlejerk altcoin using POW only to distribute remaining subsidies.
By using even more POW? You're not talking any sense. Governance model was designed since the beginning. Takeovers are things that happen all the time in free markets.
PoW is exactly how Craig lost his hostile takeover. If you follow PoW then why look to BSVwhich has less than BCH, and BTC? Checkpoints are hardly an issue, and hardly centralised.
Roger showed skin to make sure split happened. But Craig managed to scare with words only ABC so they give up on the core governance principles and expose centralization of its fork.
Actually, hashrate is following price. Most miners always put their hash power into the coin with highest profit. Which will cause hashrate always proportional to the price.
Actually, hashrate is following price. Most miners always put their hash power into the coin with highest profit. Which will cause hashrate always proportional to the price.
I don't think you yet fully absorbed the influence of subsidies in the bitcoin. No subsidies, no price/reward coupling for miners. And eventually, we need to get there, else inflation
Shammah before he left ABC told me in a tweet that main reason for a split contingency was a refusal of nChain to accept Avalanche in the roadmap. So not surprising at all...
You said you get a ton of likes for correcting me and also I only got likes from you. Math must be as hard as paraphrasing for you! Also connecting the dots. You like it simple. Gotcha