Fixes for selfish mining (fake problem) and for 0-conf (also never a problem)
Bear in mind, I was suspicious about Amaury from day 1, but only now am I 100% sure he is a paid saboteur.
The guy keeps trying to introduce protocol changes no one asked for, for problems that don't exist. Then he attacks CSW non-stop for pointing out that Bitcoin works right now.
here is midmagic recommending Contrarian's posts to everyone in rBitcoin.
2. Midmagic is an account known to be very close to Greg Maxwell, the Blockstream developer who was caught manipulating rBitcoin to prove that rbtc engages in brigading,
freelance work. Here is also Contrarian making fun of rbtc in a pattern typical of Blockstream trolls.
investors have been scammed by CSW, that Andrew O'Hara was also fooled by CSW, believes that Szabo could be Satoshi because of a blog post announcing that he was available for
a blog post from Nick Szabo where the word bitcoin or cryptocurrency is not mentioned even once. Contrarian, the guy who thinks Gavin was bamboozled by CSW, that nChain's
Again 1 year ago, before the bch fork even happened here is Contrarian insinuating that Nick Szabo could be Satoshi, asking someone to reconsider their skepticism about such
standard and admits it is likely that Szabo could be Satoshi, even more likely than Finney, because Szabo has known Finney since 1993.
The person with steel logic, that continuously and misleadingly points out how there is, lo and behold, ZERO evidence that CSW is Satoshi, in this comment lowers his evidence
Szabo is Satoshi instead "because Hal Finney has known Nick Szabo since 1993, and his correspondence with Satoshi is probably Szabo who wants to remain anonymous".
Then from over 1 year ago, there is a comment of someone stating that they believe Hal Finney is likely to be Satoshi. Contrarian pops up to disagree and insinuates that Nick
Does that ring any bell? Yeah right, November is when Greg Maxwell resigned from Blockstream
From there his post count went further up in December and peaked in January where he did 347 posts.
First and foremost, if you look at Contrarian's account activity he did 5 posts total in September, 5 posts in October and boom 170 posts in November.
we also know that another important component in Blockstream's narrative is to push the lie that Nick Szabo is Satoshi.
We all know Blockstream kicked Gavin Andresen out of Bitcoin for being "compromised" when he said he had proof CSW was Satoshi,
apparently Contrarian also believes that Nick Szabo is Satoshi.
However, by digging deeper trying to find a comment where he calls Roger Ver a scammer (which he seems to have deleted) I found another pattern,
