"More node implementations.. competition are good for #Bitcoin. .. #BitcoinSV project welcomes engagement from other implementation developer teams that choose to support the consensus changes proposed by #BitcoinSV."
Look into BlackNet and the other stuff CSW has cited for 128mb blocks. It's insane, and probably the first time I felt truly, deep in my heart confident in BCH.
dude, the math checks out. in some cases it is possible for miners to gain small advantages over others with less hashrate.
it's like blocksize. do we need 1 GB blocks now? no, we couldn't fill them if we tried. but devs need to build a system that can handle that capacity in advance of demand. play to win.
I'm not a fan of CSW by any means. But I find myself agreeing with him this time. I believe miners should take steps to hiring devs to implement what they want. I'd like to see others follow CoinGeek's steps.
Ver preached everyone should buy BTC when it was still $0.2 and was called Bitcoin Jesus for it. Now he's hated for preaching for something the mob doesn't like. It's truly hilarious when you think about it.
$vegardwikeby It's clear $handles can be the next bank account number of BCH. Looking forward to when handles themselves are decentralized and BCH protocol compatible on-chain.
I introduced this guy to BCH and help him download @handcash while he was giving us a lift with a friend in the rain today. His handle is $WANI. He was totally amazed. #BCH4everyone http://imgur.com/gallery/XbCVMnj