We dont need CTOR for 1gb blocks...
everyone who uses `Faketoshi` needs to read this -
https://archive.fo/kjuLi ...it would be dumb for CSW to actually prove that he is Satoshi; it's enough that Ross Ulbricht is in prison
ABC is the biggest threat to BTC - with ABC's upgrade BCH will make BTC look like a sad joke.
Wrong. ABC is the biggest attack on BCH yet. SV is the correct path
There will be no BCH with SV. I believe his intent is to destroy BCH entirely. His SV client and manufactured dissent is just a cover story for a 51% attack on BCH.
ABC is the biggest threat to BTC - with ABC's upgrade BCH will make BTC look like a sad joke.
since SV was caught unprepared to ABC and didn't provide any serious upgrade proposal.
SV did. Leaving damaging opcodes out is an upgrade compared to letting them in.
Yes, and they will get that with ABC along with the neccesseary optimizations to achieve gigabyte blocks. SV offers no concrete info on how they will fix the bottlenecks.
Ok so you have that info right in your link. Businesses need a clear pathway to higher blocksizes. 128Mb is kind of small but it may do for now. At least showing some progress.
How do you think those businesses will react when the blocks start crapping out anytime they reach 22mb? Bad experience=bad business. Issues need to be resolved while there is less tx.
No such thing.
Would this require a change in the BCH protocol?
..."carrier transactions"... which is fine and should be able to be implemented I would think... but it would complicate things somewhat (I would imagine).
Would this require a change in the BCH protocol?
As far as I know... transactions with multiple OP_RETURNs in one transaction are considered "non-standard" by miners and are not relayed at present... would thus need to do multiple..
What is the thinking behind the character limit in #memo? Wouldn't the BCH cost keep posts short without this?
This is a limit in the size of OP_RETURN transaction outputs. Longer messages would require multiple transactions which we haven't added support for yet. Thanks for your question.
BTC Maximalism vs the Truth:
Luke Jr solving the lite client problem.
I'm surprised Luke Dash hasn't threatened light wallets with physical destruction.
#cultofcore
fighting in favour of some common rules unless they seem FAIR and JUST... voluntaryism meets these criteria... No other set of basic rules (laws) has a hope in hell for 100% unanimous agreement.
universalisable set of rules that is simultaneously objective (can't just have arbitrary or particularisable rules) and agreeable... i.e. there's no point in trying to convince people to stop with the
Some are better looking, funnier, more charismatic... some people have parents who are all of these things and love and care... others are not so fortunate... this is life... voluntaryism is the only
Either way... by restrictive co-op ONLY arrangements or by free market voluntaryism, you end up with inequalities in every facet of life because people are not equal. Some are faster, smarter, stronger.
That just doesn't suit everybody... in fact... when you let people freely choose... most people prefer to keep their fixed labour $$ entirely separate from investment $$.
regime to maintain... I want you to really think about this please... this is a big one. I'm not strawmanning. I know what you're thinking of with arrangements where everyone shares an equal stake
(As you are suggesting)... coops like you're suggesting is fine but if you restrict everybody's options to ONLY co-op arrangements... this would be very damaging and would require an authoritarian
now unable to pay your rent etc... feed your kids... Maybe I do want to own shares / equity and take risk... but maybe I don't want to have ALL of my $$ invested ONLY in the particular place that I work
The reason most people don't freely choose coops over more conventional arrangements (in general) is because it sure would suck to work for the whole year but if the business makes a net loss... you are
You realise that "workplace democracy" also known as "Co-ops" are just a subset of capitalism right? Where people sovereign over their own body and property to trade their labour as they see fit...
BitcoinXio is anonymous and all we know is that he definitely treats SV-supporters differently than ABC supporters
What is veiled censorship? As long as mod logs are open and I can read downvoted content I'm okay
Does r/btc use veiled censorship in the form of voting-bots and uneven modding (some users are allowed to be massively trolled and harassed, but if they say anything back they are banned)
Yes, r/btc is being ran by pro-ABC mods that use veiled censorship
BitcoinXio is anonymous and all we know is that he definitely treats SV-supporters differently than ABC supporters
This guys? Professor of economic Richard Wolf? Mate, everything being said in that video/interview is 100% correct.
You're prepared to defend Labour Theory of Value? That is an utterly indefensible position. We've known this since what? At least the early 1950s!
