That's your opinion and i can accept it, because i am mature enough to know that everyone is entitled to have one, but i don't agree with it. So let's just ignore each other from now.
"Let’s eliminate the limit. Nothing bad will happen if we do. And if I’m wrong, the bad things would be mild annoyances, not existential risks." -- Gavin Andresen
Anything but a chain split, please. It sucks to think that my (and others) hard work onboarding new folks will be for naught. Both Amaury and CSW have not been helping this case AT ALL.
New memo++ features allowing increased font size are great. I still think larger profile pictures would make a huge difference visually. Just a doubling in size would be great.
I introduced this guy to BCH and help him download @handcash while he was giving us a lift with a friend in the rain today. His handle is $WANI. He was totally amazed. #BCH4everyone http://imgur.com/gallery/XbCVMnj
$vegardwikeby It's clear $handles can be the next bank account number of BCH. Looking forward to when handles themselves are decentralized and BCH protocol compatible on-chain.
With decentralized handles, how do you prevent squatting? Unfortunately I don't think handles alone will scale. I think a hybrid system of handles + web of trust could work.
I'm not a fan of CSW by any means. But I find myself agreeing with him this time. I believe miners should take steps to hiring devs to implement what they want. I'd like to see others follow CoinGeek's steps.