Total bullshit. All the hash power supported these changes expect for Calvin's. CSW and Calvin said for a whole 6 months: let's let POW decide. Well, right now BCH has 25% more POW
There is no hashwar. You guys admitted defeat when you had to add checkpoints because you ran out of money for hash power.
You forked away from Nakamoto Consensus.
Limiting tech how? They have more stable node software, and better scaling potential than BSV. Wormhole is a side project for those who want to get involved with ICO's.
So you are saying that the dev's get to taint the code for their own ICO scams.
Secondly to build ON TOP OF SV SHITCOIN one must grant permission to use his patents. Thirdly, if you don't like CTOR which scales massively the real bitcoin as cash, u r free GTFO.
Then why CSW and Charles X are saying SV is permissioned development? Maybe you should listen more carefully to your dear leaders?
-massive facepalm
Charles X is a communist trying to build a second layer for his master.
Of course, block propagation isn't a problem on a centralized network. Moron.
There is no problem with block propigation if you take out the saboaged code put in by Greg and Amuary.
This is a Core troll narrative. Looking at short term market fluctuations instead of the tech. If you want a Bitcoin that can scale then look to BCH.
That's the dumbest statment i've heard. BCH devs are limiting tech to force people into wormhole.
UnitedCorp Launches Suit against Bitmain, Bitcoin.com, Roger Ver, Kraken Bitcoin Exchange and others Alleging Hijacking of the Bitcoin Cash Network
http://bit.ly/2Eis26v
"UnitedCorp Launches Suit against Bitmain, Bitcoin.com, Roger Ver, Kraken Bitcoin Exchange and others Alleging Hijacking of the Bitcoin Cash Network - NASDAQ.com"
http://bit.ly/2Eis26v
"We got leak of Bitmain Q3 numbers! COMPLETE DISASTER. The company lost $740 Million including losses on inventory and bitcoin cash! And this is not accounting for hash war costs!"
http://bit.ly/2Sscxfl
Avalance is the first step to POS.
Locking down the code goes against Satoshi's vision.
That was a really deep statment.
Improving code that doesn't change the economics of the protocol is fine.
The problem is when an bunch of communist come here and concern troll.
The ones included in Bitcoin 0.1 which blockstream removed.
You must be new to this.
Not during a fork.
Listen we've been through this already for 7 years.
Nobody is buying your shilling, as you can clearly see from the bch price chart.
Adding op codes no body asked for and that are not in the white paper.
Adding pre consensus. (Avalanche)
Adding Checkpoints.
Last time I checked SV was ahead in block height.
Plus when you put checkpoints in you basically admit defeat.
You don't get to decide when its over by putting in a checkpoint.
CSW works for the same people Blockstream works for, otherwise why would "Satoshi" attack BCH instead of BTC?
Here is a graph showing the leadership skills of Roger and Jihan from the day Bitcoin Cash forked.
CSW works for the same people Blockstream works for, otherwise why would "Satoshi" attack BCH instead of BTC?
CSW didn't attack BCH, Roger and Jihan did by forking away from the white paper, and removing nakamoto consensus.
If it wasn't for them BCH would be over $1000 right now.
As usual A bunch of hogwash and fud from CSW. You must have your mouth around his Di*k. I guess they don't call you the FUD faucet for nothing.
I don't think you even understand what it says. Remember you're Mike the Retard.
I don't mean to bust your FUD bubble. https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9lp35y/the_squire_mining_penny_stock_company_promoted_by/
Nothing on r/btc is real.
Roger Ver wants economic freedom for the world(Gives out BCH). CSW wants to sue the pants off everybody with 400 patents. Who is giving , who is taking?
Squire Mining Ltd To Acquire CoinGeek.com and 1.0 Million TH/s of Mining Assets, Forming the Largest Public Crypto Mining Company.
I'm willing to bet that BCH will have larger sustained blocks before BSV. As soon as Graphene is fully activated in BU and ported to ABCs XThinner, it will be an indisbutable reality.
No, Avalanche doesn't affect consensus, because is pre-consensus. It improves 0-conf safety, which is needed for adoption. Forfeits are great, but only useful for big purchases.
